Webseiten-Bericht für elefant.haus

elefant.haus

Webseiten-Bericht für elefant.haus

 Generiert am 13 Dezember 2025 09:31 AM

Aktuelle Statistiken? UPDATE !

Der Wert ist 54/100

SEO Inhalte

Die Inhaltsanalyse zeigt, ob Seitentitel, Beschreibungen, Überschriften, Bilder und Textstruktur Suchmaschinen und Besuchern klare Signale geben.

Seitentitel

Elefant Haus

Länge : 12

Der Seitentitel von elefant.haus ist mit 12 Zeichen gut dimensioniert und liegt im empfohlenen Bereich von 10 bis 70 Zeichen. Damit bekommen Suchmaschinen und Besucher schon in der Ergebnisliste einen klaren ersten Hinweis auf den Inhalt.

Seitenbeschreibung

Länge : 0

elefant.haus hat aktuell keine Seitenbeschreibung. Eine individuelle Description sollte den wichtigsten Inhalt der Seite kurz zusammenfassen und kann die Darstellung in Suchergebnissen verbessern. Mit diesem kostenlosen Werkzeug lässt sich eine passende Beschreibung vorbereiten.

Suchbegriffe

elefant.haus nutzt keine META-Suchbegriffe. Der wichtigste SEO-Faktor bleibt der sichtbare Inhalt, aber ergänzende Keywords können bei der Pflege und Dokumentation der Seite hilfreich sein. Bei Bedarf können Sie dieses kostenlose Werkzeug verwenden.

Og META Eigenschaften

Die OG-Meta-Daten von elefant.haus sind vorhanden. Das verbessert die technische Grundlage für geteilte Links, weil Vorschauen nicht allein automatisch erraten werden müssen.

Eigenschaft Inhalt
title Elefant Haus
type website
url https://sites.google.com/view/elefant-haus/
description Elefant Haus Jan 2020, a "naked house Passivhaus" left for five years unfinished and deteriorating by the 'naked house' contractor.
image https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sitesv/AAzXCkcot4l3WaMyPnw7D6dve6gp7HA0H1-LRawbzYXvWkmdQjq0hj2Z08yRrdh6eGqWN_mrmiqMm1csiBMXmqKHi4gG4_X55YE1FLEST_LWuvqiSehC_0NY46zcIQK3b7NW8Hs6QhvWXI3qvfjbuV9CIMiXrw=w16383

Überschriften

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
3 0 34 0 0 0
  • [H1] Home (not)
  • [H1] Elefant Haus Jan 2020, a "naked house Passivhaus" left for five years unfinished and deteriorating by the 'naked house' contractor.
  • [H1] A Passivhaus home to retire to
  • [H3] ▲  An extremely distressed Elefant.Haus avatar. Are you able to help?
  • [H3] SADLY THERE IS NO PROFIT IN THIS FOR PASSIVHAUS
  • [H3] Spring 2015 I was contacted by ‘naked house’ contractor PP. Based on the tender drawings and specification by the architect who had referred them to me, PP promised full services to deliver my design for the wholly completed Passivhaus under the ‘naked house’ scheme, by Christmas 2015, and for which they took 90% of the contract sum. 
  • [H3] Employing a prefabricated timber frame supplied by Eco House International (EHI) in Latvia, doors and windows are by GreenSteps, with whom PP is allied to deliver the ‘naked house’ scheme. As an example, they showed me around “GreenSteps timber frame eco-houses” in East Dulwich.
  • [H3] An initial period of construction gave rise to serious causes for concern, including damage to the neighbouring properties. It has been followed by four years during which, while publicly paying lip service to their responsibility for the defects and for putting them right, they repeatedly contrive to circumvent rectifying the defects or completing the work
  • [H3] My project “Elephant & Castle – A newbuild Passivhaus in central London” was removed from the ‘naked house’ Projects page for “commercial reasons”, all subsequent projects were put through their parallel company, while the building was left neglected and deteriorating as coverings failed and it became increasingly exposed to the elements. 
  • [H3] Having departed from the tender design PP refuses to supply documentation of the building ‘as built’ to me or as required by external assessors eg building control or the Passivhaus certifier. Meanwhile accounts given, particularly of the foundations and underground pipes, sought to deny serious causes for concern. They repeatedly refused to comply with the requirement, by building control and an Adjudication Decision, to substantiate their versions, which proved to be false. This is an offence.
  • [H3] Pressing for acceptance of their false account of the building, PP repeatedly refused to address all other issues or take matters up with their PI insurers. As a result, given that the policy had been renewed year on year without disclosing “grounds likely to give rise to a claim”, cover for all defects was refused. These defects are such as to cast doubt even on the cost effectiveness of repair. PP finally defaulted completely on their contract, passing the entire burden on to me, including likely prosecution by Southwark Council for failure of building standards.
  • [H3] The building they are content to deliver falls spectacularly short even of the promises made for the basic ‘naked house’ scheme for “successful Passivhaus construction”.
  • [H3] ● Foundations and underground pipes; there is cause for concern about the manhole now partially demolished and made inaccessible beneath the slab, the integrity of the foundations and underground pipes where they affect one another and the adequacy of the rebar. This requires the reinstatement of the manhole and extensive further exploratory excavation and repair.
  • [H3] ● Vulnerability to damp; inadequate DPM, non-waterproof plasterboard on outside of side walls in contact with neighbouring walls unprotected by a damp course and the positioning of the bottom of the timber frame 120mm below the level of the pavement, give serious cause for concern about continuing vulnerability to damp in the long term. A TRADA survey of the integrity of the structure is required.
  • [H3] ● Passivhaus/Mechanical Services; none of the pipe runs were, as had been promised under the scheme, incorporated into the prefabricated wall panels. Any pipes added subsequently, to no given plan, are destructive and substandard. No heating or ventilation equipment has been installed. All requests, by me or Passivhaus certifier Peter Warm, for drawings, specifications, calculations, PHPP, air tightness etc are stonewalled.
  • [H3] ● Cladding/render/flashing; the application of the Marley Eternit panels fails to meet any of the manufacturer’s requirements; all the membranes, battens and cladding, need to be replaced, the side walls remain to be rendered and horizontal and vertical flashing installed.
  • [H3] ● Generally throughout; the standard of building work is “incredibly poor” and incomplete: ‘office’ doors already bent and broken; lost keys and an inferior replacement front door lock; flaking and damaged paintwork on doors and windows; office consumer unit not in the office; stairs that deviate inexplicably from the design and the regulations; the wood supporting the roof terrace decking resting directly on the roof covering, frequently damp and hindering the already inefficient flow of water from the roof; hoppers blocked by loose timber in the parapet; water meter disconnected and discarded; sections of insulation and wall linings missing. Lighting, flooring, bannister, handrails, decorating, front step, capping to the parapet, sedum roof, solar panels, water tank, kitchen, bathroom etc either defective, not started at all or not finished. All this despite the promised completion date of Christmas 2015.
  • [H3] ● No specifications, instructions, guarantees or certificates etc, that would normally be required or were promised in the contract, have ever been supplied.
  • [H3] I was 65 when the defects in the building became apparent and I faced the shocking realisation that I now had neither my savings nor the building I was relying on as a home and to provide me with an income from the ground floor office. Now I am 70. Years of spurious excuses and dismissive treatment have culminated in the clear expression of just how exploitable and expendable they regard my project and me, a single female pensioner.
  • [H3] SADLY THERE IS NO PROFIT IN THIS FOR PASSIVHAUS
  • [H3] Spring 2015 I was contacted by ‘naked house’ contractor PP. Based on the tender drawings and specification by the architect who had referred them to me, PP promised full services to deliver my design for the wholly completed Passivhaus under the ‘naked house’ scheme, by Christmas 2015, and for which they took 90% of the contract sum. 
  • [H3] Employing a prefabricated timber frame supplied by Eco House International (EHI) in Latvia, doors and windows are by GreenSteps, with whom PP is allied to deliver the ‘naked house’ scheme. As an example, they showed me around “GreenSteps timber frame eco-houses” in East Dulwich.
  • [H3] An initial period of construction gave rise to serious causes for concern, including damage to the neighbouring properties. It has been followed by four years during which, while publicly paying lip service to their responsibility for the defects and for putting them right, they repeatedly contrive to circumvent rectifying the defects or completing the work
  • [H3] My project “Elephant & Castle – A newbuild Passivhaus in central London” was removed from the ‘naked house’ Projects page for “commercial reasons”, all subsequent projects were put through their parallel company, while the building was left neglected and deteriorating as coverings failed and it became increasingly exposed to the elements. 
  • [H3] Having departed from the tender design PP refuses to supply documentation of the building ‘as built’ to me or as required by external assessors eg building control or the Passivhaus certifier. Meanwhile accounts given, particularly of the foundations and underground pipes, sought to deny serious causes for concern. They repeatedly refused to comply with the requirement, by building control and an Adjudication Decision, to substantiate their versions, which proved to be false. This is an offence.
  • [H3] Pressing for acceptance of their false account of the building, PP repeatedly refused to address all other issues or take matters up with their PI insurers. As a result, given that the policy had been renewed year on year without disclosing “grounds likely to give rise to a claim”, cover for all defects was refused. These defects are such as to cast doubt even on the cost effectiveness of repair. PP finally defaulted completely on their contract, passing the entire burden on to me, including likely prosecution by Southwark Council for failure of building standards.
  • [H3] The building they are content to deliver falls spectacularly short even of the promises made for the basic ‘naked house’ scheme for “successful Passivhaus construction”.
  • [H3] ● Foundations and underground pipes; there is cause for concern about the manhole now partially demolished and made inaccessible beneath the slab, the integrity of the foundations and underground pipes where they affect one another and the adequacy of the rebar. This requires the reinstatement of the manhole and extensive further exploratory excavation and repair.
  • [H3] ● Vulnerability to damp; inadequate DPM, non-waterproof plasterboard on outside of side walls in contact with neighbouring walls unprotected by a damp course and the positioning of the bottom of the timber frame 120mm below the level of the pavement, give serious cause for concern about continuing vulnerability to damp in the long term. A TRADA survey of the integrity of the structure is required.
  • [H3] ● Passivhaus/Mechanical Services; none of the pipe runs were, as had been promised under the scheme, incorporated into the prefabricated wall panels. Any pipes added subsequently, to no given plan, are destructive and substandard. No heating or ventilation equipment has been installed. All requests, by me or Passivhaus certifier Peter Warm, for drawings, specifications, calculations, PHPP, air tightness etc are stonewalled.
  • [H3] ● Cladding/render/flashing; the application of the Marley Eternit panels fails to meet any of the manufacturer’s requirements; all the membranes, battens and cladding, need to be replaced, the side walls remain to be rendered and horizontal and vertical flashing installed.
  • [H3] ● Generally throughout; the standard of building work is “incredibly poor” and incomplete: ‘office’ doors already bent and broken; lost keys and an inferior replacement front door lock; flaking and damaged paintwork on doors and windows; office consumer unit not in the office; stairs that deviate inexplicably from the design and the regulations; the wood supporting the roof terrace decking resting directly on the roof covering, frequently damp and hindering the already inefficient flow of water from the roof; hoppers blocked by loose timber in the parapet; water meter disconnected and discarded; sections of insulation and wall linings missing. Lighting, flooring, bannister, handrails, decorating, front step, capping to the parapet, sedum roof, solar panels, water tank, kitchen, bathroom etc either defective, not started at all or not finished. All this despite the promised completion date of Christmas 2015.
  • [H3] ● No specifications, instructions, guarantees or certificates etc, that would normally be required or were promised in the contract, have ever been supplied.
  • [H3] I was 65 when the defects in the building became apparent and I faced the shocking realisation that I now had neither my savings nor the building I was relying on as a home and to provide me with an income from the ground floor office. Now I am 70. Years of spurious excuses and dismissive treatment have culminated in the clear expression of just how exploitable and expendable they regard my project and me, a single female pensioner.
  • [H3] THIS IS THE SAME HEADING AS BEFORE BUT BOLD
  • [H3] Text here 
  • [H3] Please visit Elefant.Haus again as further information continues to be added regarding the ongoing appalling circumstances of my Elefant Haus project.

Bilder

Es konnten 3 Bilder auf dieser Webseite gefunden werden.

Die Bilder von elefant.haus sollten nachgearbeitet werden: 3 ALT-Attribute fehlen. Sinnvolle ALT-Texte erklären, was auf den Bildern zu sehen ist, und machen den Inhalt robuster für SEO und Barrierefreiheit.

Text/HTML Verhältnis

Anteil : 8%

elefant.haus hat mit 8% einen sehr niedrigen Textanteil. Die Seite sollte mehr nutzbaren Inhalt erhalten, damit Suchmaschinen nicht nur Code, Navigation oder Gestaltungselemente sehen.

Flash

elefant.haus verzichtet auf Flash-Inhalte. Dadurch bleibt die Seite technisch zeitgemäßer und für Nutzer wie Suchmaschinen leichter zugänglich.

IFrame

Bei elefant.haus wurden keine IFrames erkannt. Das reduziert technische Abhängigkeiten und macht die Seite für Analyse, Indexierung und Wartung übersichtlicher.

Eine klare Linkstruktur erleichtert Suchmaschinen das Crawlen, verteilt interne Relevanz und hilft Besuchern, wichtige Inhalte schnell zu finden.

URL Rewrite

Die URLs von elefant.haus sind gut lesbar und wirken suchmaschinenfreundlich. Sprechende Links helfen Nutzern und Crawlern, den Inhalt einer Seite bereits anhand der Adresse besser einzuschätzen.

Underscores in the URLs

elefant.haus verwendet keine Unterstriche in den geprüften Links. Das unterstützt eine klare und übliche URL-Schreibweise.

In-page links

We found a total of 9 links including 0 link(s) to files

Anker Typ Natürlich
Home intern natürliche Links
Project No.2 i intern natürliche Links
'naked house' intern natürliche Links
Adjudication intern natürliche Links
Photos ii intern natürliche Links
Problems □ intern natürliche Links
Social media intern natürliche Links
Removed from 'n h' intern natürliche Links
'Passivhaus Goes Personal' intern natürliche Links

SEO Suchbegriffe

Die Suchbegriffsauswertung zeigt, welche Themen die Seite tatsächlich vermittelt und ob wichtige Begriffe in Inhalt und Seitenelementen konsistent vorkommen.

Suchbegriffswolke

all from passivhaus defects building naked project house damp been

Keywords Consistency

Suchbegriff Inhalt Seitentitel Suchbegriffe Seitenbeschreibung Überschriften
building 20
passivhaus 17
house 17
naked 15
from 14

Benutzerfreundlichkeit

Gute Benutzerfreundlichkeit stärkt Vertrauen und erleichtert die Nutzung. Geprüft werden unter anderem URL, Favicon, Sprache und Druckdarstellung.

URL

Domain : elefant.haus

Länge : 12

Favoriten Icon

Ein Favicon ist für elefant.haus vorhanden. Das ist ein kleines, aber sichtbares Signal für Markenwirkung und Nutzerorientierung.

Druckeigenschaften

elefant.haus hat offenbar keine druckfreundliche CSS-Variante. Wenn Inhalte häufig ausgedruckt werden, lohnt sich eine angepasste Print-Darstellung.

Sprache

elefant.haus deklariert die Sprache als en. Das hilft Browsern, Suchmaschinen und Hilfstechnologien bei Aussprache, Darstellung und regionaler Einordnung.

Dublin Core

elefant.haus verzichtet auf Dublin-Core-Metadaten. Falls die Seite stark dokumenten- oder publikationsorientiert ist, könnten solche Angaben ergänzt werden.

Dokument

Sauberes HTML, eine korrekte Zeichencodierung und moderne Standards verbessern Kompatibilität, Zugänglichkeit und die zuverlässige Verarbeitung der Seite.

Doctype

HTML 5

Verschlüsselung

Der Zeichensatz von elefant.haus ist angegeben: UTF-8. Dadurch sinkt das Risiko fehlerhafter Zeichenanzeige in Browsern und Auswertungssystemen.

W3C Validität

Fehler : 0

Warnungen : 0

E-Mail Datenschutz

elefant.haus zeigt keine offen auslesbare E-Mail-Adresse. Das ist positiv für Datenschutz und Spam-Vermeidung.

Veraltetes HTML

Im Quelltext von elefant.haus wurden keine deprecated HTML-Tags erkannt. Aktuelle HTML-Strukturen sind robuster für Browser und Validatoren.

Tipps zur Webseitengeschwindigkeit

elefant.haus nutzt keine verschachtelten Tabellen. Das macht Layout und Quelltext leichter wartbar und besser zugänglich.
elefant.haus nutzt CSS direkt in HTML-Elementen. Eine Auslagerung in CSS-Dateien kann den Quelltext übersichtlicher und besser wartbar machen.
Die Anzahl der CSS-Dateien bei elefant.haus wirkt unkritisch. Wenige, sinnvoll gebündelte Stylesheets erleichtern die technische Optimierung.
Die JavaScript-Anzahl von elefant.haus ist unauffällig. Eine schlanke Skriptstruktur hilft besonders auf mobilen Geräten.
elefant.haus nutzt gzip-Komprimierung. Dadurch können HTML, CSS und JavaScript kleiner übertragen werden, was die Ladezeit verbessern kann.

Mobile

Mobile Optimierung ist wichtig, weil viele Besucher Smartphones nutzen. Viewport, Icons und ungeeignete Technologien beeinflussen Darstellung und Bedienbarkeit.

Mobile Optimierung

Apple Icon
META Viewport Tag
Flash Inhalt

Optimierung

Sitemap, robots.txt, Komprimierung und Analysesysteme beeinflussen, wie effizient eine Website gecrawlt, ausgeliefert und gezielt weiterentwickelt werden kann.

XML-Sitemap

Eine XML-Sitemap ist für elefant.haus vorhanden. Sie unterstützt Crawler dabei, die Seitenstruktur effizienter zu verstehen.

https://sites.google.com/view/elefant-haus/

Robots.txt

http://elefant.haus/robots.txt

elefant.haus enthält eine robots.txt-Datei. Damit lassen sich Crawler-Regeln und der Hinweis auf die Sitemap zentral steuern.

Analytics

Fehlt

Für elefant.haus wurde kein Analyse-Tool erkannt. Ohne Webanalyse bleibt schwer nachvollziehbar, wie Besucher die Seite tatsächlich nutzen.

PageSpeed Insights

PageSpeed Insights bewertet Leistung, Barrierefreiheit, bewährte Verfahren und SEO für Desktop und Mobilgeräte und macht technische Bremsen sichtbar.

Gerät
Kategorien

Website-Überprüfung

Website-Überprüfung ist ein kostenloses SEO Werkzeug zur Analyse Ihrer Webseite