elefant.haus

Webseiten-Bericht für elefant.haus

 Generiert am 13 Dezember 2025 09:31 AM

Aktuelle Statistiken? UPDATE !

Der Wert ist 54/100

SEO Inhalte

Seitentitel

Elefant Haus

Länge : 12

Perfekt, denn Ihr Seitentitel enthält zwischen 10 und 70 Anzahl Zeichen.

Seitenbeschreibung

Länge : 0

Schlecht. Wir konnten keine Seitenbeschreibung auf Ihrer Webseite finden. Benutzen Sie dieses kostenlose Werkzeug um eine Seitenbeschreibung zu erzeugen.

Suchbegriffe

Nicht so gut. Wir konnten keine META-Suchbegriffe auf Ihrer Webseite finden. Benutzen Sie dieses kostenlose Werkzeug um META-Suchbegriffe zu erzeugen.

Og META Eigenschaften

Sehr gut, denn diese Webseite nutzt die Vorteile aus den Og Properties.

Eigenschaft Inhalt
title Elefant Haus
type website
url https://sites.google.com/view/elefant-haus/
description Elefant Haus Jan 2020, a "naked house Passivhaus" left for five years unfinished and deteriorating by the 'naked house' contractor.
image https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sitesv/AAzXCkcot4l3WaMyPnw7D6dve6gp7HA0H1-LRawbzYXvWkmdQjq0hj2Z08yRrdh6eGqWN_mrmiqMm1csiBMXmqKHi4gG4_X55YE1FLEST_LWuvqiSehC_0NY46zcIQK3b7NW8Hs6QhvWXI3qvfjbuV9CIMiXrw=w16383

Überschriften

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
3 0 34 0 0 0
  • [H1] Home (not)
  • [H1] Elefant Haus Jan 2020, a "naked house Passivhaus" left for five years unfinished and deteriorating by the 'naked house' contractor.
  • [H1] A Passivhaus home to retire to
  • [H3] ▲  An extremely distressed Elefant.Haus avatar. Are you able to help?
  • [H3] SADLY THERE IS NO PROFIT IN THIS FOR PASSIVHAUS
  • [H3] Spring 2015 I was contacted by ‘naked house’ contractor PP. Based on the tender drawings and specification by the architect who had referred them to me, PP promised full services to deliver my design for the wholly completed Passivhaus under the ‘naked house’ scheme, by Christmas 2015, and for which they took 90% of the contract sum. 
  • [H3] Employing a prefabricated timber frame supplied by Eco House International (EHI) in Latvia, doors and windows are by GreenSteps, with whom PP is allied to deliver the ‘naked house’ scheme. As an example, they showed me around “GreenSteps timber frame eco-houses” in East Dulwich.
  • [H3] An initial period of construction gave rise to serious causes for concern, including damage to the neighbouring properties. It has been followed by four years during which, while publicly paying lip service to their responsibility for the defects and for putting them right, they repeatedly contrive to circumvent rectifying the defects or completing the work
  • [H3] My project “Elephant & Castle – A newbuild Passivhaus in central London” was removed from the ‘naked house’ Projects page for “commercial reasons”, all subsequent projects were put through their parallel company, while the building was left neglected and deteriorating as coverings failed and it became increasingly exposed to the elements. 
  • [H3] Having departed from the tender design PP refuses to supply documentation of the building ‘as built’ to me or as required by external assessors eg building control or the Passivhaus certifier. Meanwhile accounts given, particularly of the foundations and underground pipes, sought to deny serious causes for concern. They repeatedly refused to comply with the requirement, by building control and an Adjudication Decision, to substantiate their versions, which proved to be false. This is an offence.
  • [H3] Pressing for acceptance of their false account of the building, PP repeatedly refused to address all other issues or take matters up with their PI insurers. As a result, given that the policy had been renewed year on year without disclosing “grounds likely to give rise to a claim”, cover for all defects was refused. These defects are such as to cast doubt even on the cost effectiveness of repair. PP finally defaulted completely on their contract, passing the entire burden on to me, including likely prosecution by Southwark Council for failure of building standards.
  • [H3] The building they are content to deliver falls spectacularly short even of the promises made for the basic ‘naked house’ scheme for “successful Passivhaus construction”.
  • [H3] ● Foundations and underground pipes; there is cause for concern about the manhole now partially demolished and made inaccessible beneath the slab, the integrity of the foundations and underground pipes where they affect one another and the adequacy of the rebar. This requires the reinstatement of the manhole and extensive further exploratory excavation and repair.
  • [H3] ● Vulnerability to damp; inadequate DPM, non-waterproof plasterboard on outside of side walls in contact with neighbouring walls unprotected by a damp course and the positioning of the bottom of the timber frame 120mm below the level of the pavement, give serious cause for concern about continuing vulnerability to damp in the long term. A TRADA survey of the integrity of the structure is required.
  • [H3] ● Passivhaus/Mechanical Services; none of the pipe runs were, as had been promised under the scheme, incorporated into the prefabricated wall panels. Any pipes added subsequently, to no given plan, are destructive and substandard. No heating or ventilation equipment has been installed. All requests, by me or Passivhaus certifier Peter Warm, for drawings, specifications, calculations, PHPP, air tightness etc are stonewalled.
  • [H3] ● Cladding/render/flashing; the application of the Marley Eternit panels fails to meet any of the manufacturer’s requirements; all the membranes, battens and cladding, need to be replaced, the side walls remain to be rendered and horizontal and vertical flashing installed.
  • [H3] ● Generally throughout; the standard of building work is “incredibly poor” and incomplete: ‘office’ doors already bent and broken; lost keys and an inferior replacement front door lock; flaking and damaged paintwork on doors and windows; office consumer unit not in the office; stairs that deviate inexplicably from the design and the regulations; the wood supporting the roof terrace decking resting directly on the roof covering, frequently damp and hindering the already inefficient flow of water from the roof; hoppers blocked by loose timber in the parapet; water meter disconnected and discarded; sections of insulation and wall linings missing. Lighting, flooring, bannister, handrails, decorating, front step, capping to the parapet, sedum roof, solar panels, water tank, kitchen, bathroom etc either defective, not started at all or not finished. All this despite the promised completion date of Christmas 2015.
  • [H3] ● No specifications, instructions, guarantees or certificates etc, that would normally be required or were promised in the contract, have ever been supplied.
  • [H3] I was 65 when the defects in the building became apparent and I faced the shocking realisation that I now had neither my savings nor the building I was relying on as a home and to provide me with an income from the ground floor office. Now I am 70. Years of spurious excuses and dismissive treatment have culminated in the clear expression of just how exploitable and expendable they regard my project and me, a single female pensioner.
  • [H3] SADLY THERE IS NO PROFIT IN THIS FOR PASSIVHAUS
  • [H3] Spring 2015 I was contacted by ‘naked house’ contractor PP. Based on the tender drawings and specification by the architect who had referred them to me, PP promised full services to deliver my design for the wholly completed Passivhaus under the ‘naked house’ scheme, by Christmas 2015, and for which they took 90% of the contract sum. 
  • [H3] Employing a prefabricated timber frame supplied by Eco House International (EHI) in Latvia, doors and windows are by GreenSteps, with whom PP is allied to deliver the ‘naked house’ scheme. As an example, they showed me around “GreenSteps timber frame eco-houses” in East Dulwich.
  • [H3] An initial period of construction gave rise to serious causes for concern, including damage to the neighbouring properties. It has been followed by four years during which, while publicly paying lip service to their responsibility for the defects and for putting them right, they repeatedly contrive to circumvent rectifying the defects or completing the work
  • [H3] My project “Elephant & Castle – A newbuild Passivhaus in central London” was removed from the ‘naked house’ Projects page for “commercial reasons”, all subsequent projects were put through their parallel company, while the building was left neglected and deteriorating as coverings failed and it became increasingly exposed to the elements. 
  • [H3] Having departed from the tender design PP refuses to supply documentation of the building ‘as built’ to me or as required by external assessors eg building control or the Passivhaus certifier. Meanwhile accounts given, particularly of the foundations and underground pipes, sought to deny serious causes for concern. They repeatedly refused to comply with the requirement, by building control and an Adjudication Decision, to substantiate their versions, which proved to be false. This is an offence.
  • [H3] Pressing for acceptance of their false account of the building, PP repeatedly refused to address all other issues or take matters up with their PI insurers. As a result, given that the policy had been renewed year on year without disclosing “grounds likely to give rise to a claim”, cover for all defects was refused. These defects are such as to cast doubt even on the cost effectiveness of repair. PP finally defaulted completely on their contract, passing the entire burden on to me, including likely prosecution by Southwark Council for failure of building standards.
  • [H3] The building they are content to deliver falls spectacularly short even of the promises made for the basic ‘naked house’ scheme for “successful Passivhaus construction”.
  • [H3] ● Foundations and underground pipes; there is cause for concern about the manhole now partially demolished and made inaccessible beneath the slab, the integrity of the foundations and underground pipes where they affect one another and the adequacy of the rebar. This requires the reinstatement of the manhole and extensive further exploratory excavation and repair.
  • [H3] ● Vulnerability to damp; inadequate DPM, non-waterproof plasterboard on outside of side walls in contact with neighbouring walls unprotected by a damp course and the positioning of the bottom of the timber frame 120mm below the level of the pavement, give serious cause for concern about continuing vulnerability to damp in the long term. A TRADA survey of the integrity of the structure is required.
  • [H3] ● Passivhaus/Mechanical Services; none of the pipe runs were, as had been promised under the scheme, incorporated into the prefabricated wall panels. Any pipes added subsequently, to no given plan, are destructive and substandard. No heating or ventilation equipment has been installed. All requests, by me or Passivhaus certifier Peter Warm, for drawings, specifications, calculations, PHPP, air tightness etc are stonewalled.
  • [H3] ● Cladding/render/flashing; the application of the Marley Eternit panels fails to meet any of the manufacturer’s requirements; all the membranes, battens and cladding, need to be replaced, the side walls remain to be rendered and horizontal and vertical flashing installed.
  • [H3] ● Generally throughout; the standard of building work is “incredibly poor” and incomplete: ‘office’ doors already bent and broken; lost keys and an inferior replacement front door lock; flaking and damaged paintwork on doors and windows; office consumer unit not in the office; stairs that deviate inexplicably from the design and the regulations; the wood supporting the roof terrace decking resting directly on the roof covering, frequently damp and hindering the already inefficient flow of water from the roof; hoppers blocked by loose timber in the parapet; water meter disconnected and discarded; sections of insulation and wall linings missing. Lighting, flooring, bannister, handrails, decorating, front step, capping to the parapet, sedum roof, solar panels, water tank, kitchen, bathroom etc either defective, not started at all or not finished. All this despite the promised completion date of Christmas 2015.
  • [H3] ● No specifications, instructions, guarantees or certificates etc, that would normally be required or were promised in the contract, have ever been supplied.
  • [H3] I was 65 when the defects in the building became apparent and I faced the shocking realisation that I now had neither my savings nor the building I was relying on as a home and to provide me with an income from the ground floor office. Now I am 70. Years of spurious excuses and dismissive treatment have culminated in the clear expression of just how exploitable and expendable they regard my project and me, a single female pensioner.
  • [H3] THIS IS THE SAME HEADING AS BEFORE BUT BOLD
  • [H3] Text here 
  • [H3] Please visit Elefant.Haus again as further information continues to be added regarding the ongoing appalling circumstances of my Elefant Haus project.

Bilder

Es konnten 3 Bilder auf dieser Webseite gefunden werden.

Bei 3 Bilder(n) fehlt ein ALT-Attribut. Fügen Sie ALT-Attribute zu Ihren Bildern, um die Bedeutung der Bilder für Suchmaschinen zugänglich zu machen.

Text/HTML Verhältnis

Anteil : 8%

Das Text zu HTML Code Verhältnis dieser Webseite ist niedriger als 15 Prozent, was bedeutet, dass Sie mehr Inhalte für Ihre Webseite schreiben sollten.

Flash

Perfekt, denn es wurde kein Flash auf Ihrer Webseite gefunden.

IFrame

Großartig, denn Sie verwenden keine IFrames auf Ihrer Webseite.

URL Rewrite

Gut. Ihre Links sind für Suchmaschinen gut lesbar (sprechende Links)!

Underscores in the URLs

Perfekt! Wir haben keine Unterstriche in Ihren Links entdeckt.

In-page links

We found a total of 9 links including 0 link(s) to files

Anker Typ Natürlich
Home intern natürliche Links
Project No.2 i intern natürliche Links
'naked house' intern natürliche Links
Adjudication intern natürliche Links
Photos ii intern natürliche Links
Problems □ intern natürliche Links
Social media intern natürliche Links
Removed from 'n h' intern natürliche Links
'Passivhaus Goes Personal' intern natürliche Links

SEO Suchbegriffe

Suchbegriffswolke

all house building project naked damp from been passivhaus defects

Keywords Consistency

Suchbegriff Inhalt Seitentitel Suchbegriffe Seitenbeschreibung Überschriften
building 20
passivhaus 17
house 17
naked 15
from 14

Benutzerfreundlichkeit

URL

Domain : elefant.haus

Länge : 12

Favoriten Icon

Gut. Die Webseite hat ein Favicon.

Druckeigenschaften

Es konnten keine druckfreundlichen CSS-Angaben gefunden werden.

Sprache

Gut, denn Sie haben in den META-Elementen eine Sprache deklariert: en.

Dublin Core

Diese Webseite nutzt nicht die Vorteile der Dublin Core Elemente.

Dokument

Doctype

HTML 5

Verschlüsselung

Perfekt, denn Ihre Webseite deklariert einen Zeichensatz: UTF-8.

W3C Validität

Fehler : 0

Warnungen : 0

E-Mail Datenschutz

Sehr gut, denn es wurde keine E-Mail Adresse im Klartext auf Ihrer Webseite gefunden.

Veraltetes HTML

Sehr gut! Sie verwenden aktuelle HTML Tags in Ihrem Webseitenquelltext.

Tipps zur Webseitengeschwindigkeit

Sehr gut, denn Ihre Webseite benutzt keine verschachtelten Tabellen.
Schlecht, denn es wurden CSS-Angaben in HTML-Elementen entdeckt. Diese Angaben sollten in ein entsprechendes CSS-Stylesheet verlagert werden.
Gut, denn Ihre Webseite enthält nur wenig CSS-Dateien.
Perfekt, denn Ihre Webseite enthät nur wenig Javascript-Dateien.
Gut! Sie nutzen die Vorteile von gzip.

Mobile

Mobile Optimierung

Apple Icon
META Viewport Tag
Flash Inhalt

Optimierung

XML-Sitemap

Perfekt! Ihre Seite hat eine XML-Sitemap.

https://sites.google.com/view/elefant-haus/

Robots.txt

http://elefant.haus/robots.txt

Sehr gut! Ihre Webseite enthält eine robots.txt-Datei.

Analytics

Fehlt

Wir haben nicht ein Analyse-Tool auf dieser Website installiert zu erkennen.

Webanalyse erlaubt die Quantifizierung der Besucherinteraktionen mit Ihrer Seite. Insofern sollte zumindest ein Analysetool installiert werden. Um die Befunde abzusichern, empfiehlt sich das parallele Verwenden eines zweiten Tools.

PageSpeed Insights

Gerät
Kategorien

Website-Überprüfung

Website-Überprüfung ist ein kostenloses SEO Werkzeug zur Analyse Ihrer Webseite